The World Health Organization plays a key role in the current COVID-19 outbreak, offering advice to the whole world on how to deal with this emergency. Most countries follow this advice.
In this situation, it is obviously an enormous responsibility that rests on the shoulders of the WHO. This is a task which should be done with great care, I would think.
The kind of information which the WHO spreads to the world should be examined very carefully, and should be in harmony with current healthcare knowledge and science.
Recently, I was shocked to find out what kind of information is actually shared with the world, about the specific topic of the “WHO Herd Immunity Definition.”
I read about a strange change of the definition of “herd immunity” while reading an article on the Activist Post website , a platform which offers information not usually seen in the mainstream media.
This definition was changed in 2020 by the WHO. The Original WHO Herd Immunity Definition
as it was present on 9 June 2020 stated: “Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”
This definition makes it very clear that immunity can also be developed without vaccination in some cases. Yet this definition was removed, and on 31 December 2020 replaced by The New WHO Herd Immunity Definition.
The new definition focuses only on vaccinations, even though it is already clear that many people have developed immunity through mild or even asymptomatic COVID-19 infections.
There is no significant role for an effective response of our immune system in this new definition. “Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination.…”
This is a reversal of the truth. We know that our immune system can develop immunity against COVID-19-like diseases without vaccines in healthy people. We don’t know yet how safe the experimental vaccines are, and how much protection they will offer.
Vaccines in themselves are not bad or evil, as some people suggest. They can be used in harmony with prophylactics, treatments, and our immune system’s natural defenses for our health.
Based on the information above, I have great difficulty believing that the WHO is not influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to promote massive vaccination rather than only promoting health. If you believe differently, please contact me and let me know why you disagree.