The New Apartheid

It is not that long ago that there was apartheid in South Africa. I think we still owe Nelson Mandela our gratitude for ending this horrible system, where black and white people were separated, and considered two totally different types of people, one inferior to the other.

The old apartheid in South Africa.

We thought we left apartheid behind us for good. Fast forward to 2021, and apartheid is introduced again. Not based on the color of your skin, but based on whether you are vaccinated with an experimental vaccine against COVID-19 or not.

The ones who take this vaccine, for whatever the reason, are labeled the good guys. They are responsible, law-abiding citizens, who are able to join in society again. They are able to travel, to work, to shop, to go out, and they will carry a vaccination passport to prove they belong to this group.

The ones who don’t take the vaccine, for whatever the reason, are labeled as the bad guys. They will not be allowed to take part in society without restrictions. They will not be able to travel, to engage in cultural activities, to fly, or to stay in hotels. They can shop online and stay at home, mostly.

The new apartheid in Israel.

That is the new split introduced in our society. Governments who are confronted with all kinds of laws prohibiting mandatory vaccination, will go all-out in an effort to push everyone to take “voluntary vaccinations.” The state of apartheid will last until everyone is vaccinated, if that ever happens.

If you follow the alternative news, you will notice that all kinds of strategies are being discussed for being able to give everyone a jab. Bribe people with discounts for health insurance. Shame people publicly for not being willing to take a vaccine. Deliberately order vaccines for the whole population of your country, pretending you expect everyone will take it.

As described in the OffGardian, “The sale of the century is very much on. The powers that be want every single person to be vaccinated, and they’re pulling out all the stops to make sure it happens.”

Bribery. Celebrity Endorsements. Forced “Scarcity.” Fake “Popularity.” Plus the idea that “Resistance is useless”, because it will happen anyway. Yet underneath it all there is the stench of fear. Because those who are playing this big game notice that the resistance is growing.

I know lots of people who won’t get vaccinated. I see more and more small and big initiatives popping up, examples of resistance against vaccinations. There is a growing awareness that this is just a big game for money and power. The architects of the great reset may just have overplayed their hand.

The way that the pressure is mounting to get everyone in line, no matter what it takes, has all the energy of a desperate final attempt to finish the game. Yet without the cooperation of a big majority of the people, it will be game over for the Davos elite and their accomplices.

So in a sense it makes me happy to see the frantic action around the “vaccine push”, because I believe that these are the death throes of the great reset. So even though some things I witness are horrific, I believe that more and more people are waking up to what is really happening.

It is not over yet. Keep checking the alternative news and keep sharing good information. But keep your spirits up. Our natural longing for freedom is something that many people looking for power throughout history have underestimated. That is why they lost, and we won. So be happy and stay free!

Vaccinations, Cure or Curse?

When reading the mainstream news, the same type of statements about COVID-19 vaccinations are repeated over and over again. “We all need to get vaccinated. The vaccines that have been developed are safe. Just line up for you shot and you will be well protected.”

Now that the vaccines are being implemented worldwide, the stories about adverse side-effects are also coming more to our attention. Again the mainstream media reports that the side-effects are not that serious and don’t happen that often, the anecdotical stories tell otherwise.

Lots of deaths and neurological problems, some miscarriages and a wide range of other side-effects. Many nursing homes with COVID-19 outbreaks just after the first shot is given. Many people who need special care the day they get the vaccine. And so on, and so forth.

The deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccinations are treated as “possible side-effects.” Time and time again doctors say that we should not conclude that people actually die as a result of vaccinations, but that they are mostly old and frail people, and they are known to die, right?

With all the anecdotical stories about abundant negative side-effects, and all the comforting stories from the mainstream media, what should you believe? A very scary and interesting research report has surfaced recently, dealing with the facts, and I tend to believe what it says.

As reported in Global Research, “…the Israeli government struck a bargain with Pfizer to secure millions of doses of their mRNA COVID vaccines. To date, Israel has vaccinated over 53% of their population, twice the percentage of the next closest nation, Britain, with 26.9%.”

Global Research continues, “The “official news” published by the corporate media claiming that the vaccines have been effective in reducing rates of COVID in Israel has been scrutinized and examined by Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit’s Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ, who published their results on a discussion forum website called “Nakim.”

The essence of the results, as they are published on this forum website, is this shocking statement:

“We conclude that the Pfizer vaccines, for the elderly, killed during the 5-week vaccination period about 40 times more people than the disease itself would have killed, and about 260 times more people than the disease among the younger age class. We stress that this is in order to produce a green passport valid at most 6 months, and promote Pfizer sales.”

These finds have also been discussed on the national news of Israel, Arutz Sheva, and in the French newspaper FranceSoir.

So could it be that the “conspiracy nuts” were right? Could it be that all those who warned that the new COVID-19 vaccines are experimental vaccines, rushed through an emergency procedure, with unknown long-term effects and potentially dangerous, were right?

How come there are so many stories in alternative media about (even young) people dying or suffering horrible side-effects after taking the jab? And almost only positive stories about the vaccines in the mainstream media, about mild side-effects, and only unrelated deaths?

Could it be that the same sources that push us to all get vaccinated against a disease with a very low mortality rate, also influence what is allowed to be written about the real effects of the worldwide vaccinations? How truthful are the reports that we are allowed to see?

What is more dangerous, the COVID-19 virus or the COVID-19 vaccines?

Please do your own research. Study the findings of these researchers, and all available data. Check out alternative resources for news. Don’t accept anything you see with blind faith. Study the numbers and stay aware of how much influence a multi-billion dollar industry has on what is shown in the news.

Big Pharma & Repeat Customers

Only a few months after the first news about the COVID-19 outbreak started, the message we all got in the news was clear: “There is a very dangerous disease out there! We all need to get vaccinated!” And in a race to do that as fast as possible, Big Pharma began to develop vaccines.

When I first heard about this, I thought, “This story is deliberately simplified. We have a disease. We develop a vaccine. Everybody gets a shot. And we live happily ever after.” This was just a story that was supposed to give us some false perspective to endure the “temporary” lockdowns.

Now it turns out that I was right. The latest news is that vaccinations for COVID will become a regular event. The Pfizer CEO says you’ll need to get your COVID shot every year.  This is not going to be a one problem, one solution thing we will leave behind us.

“Every year, you need to go to get your flu vaccine,” Bourla said. “It’s going to be the same with COVID. In a year, you will have to go and get your annual shot for COVID to be protected.” No big surprise here. Big Pharma is a billion dollar industry, aiming to become a trillion dollar industry.

This is the most aggressive marketing campaign for vaccinations the world has ever encountered. Big Pharma combined with mainstream media, supported by top politicians, is pushing to get the whole world vaccinated, and it does not stop there.

Once you are vaccinated, you are registered. You will receive some kind of vaccination passport, which you need to visit shops and restaurants, to travel, to work, and so on. And any time a new shot is developed, for any kind of disease, you will be expected to line up to get your shot.

The pressure is mounting to get everyone vaccinated, as I have described in previous posts. Now it becomes more and more clear that this is only the beginning, and certainly not the end we all hoped for. You will be pushed to become a repeat customer.

Big Pharma has become the successful money machine that it is by very aggressively pursuing for repeat customers. Anyone who has spent even a modest amount of time researching Big Pharma will agree that this is a fact. In this latest scheme, you will either be a repeat customer or an outcast.

The great reset is being ushered in in full force now. It still can be stopped. I am grateful that more and more people are awakening to the fact that what is happening now worldwide has nothing to do with our health, and everything with a global grab for money and power.

COVID-19 is a disease which has a survival rate of over 98%, even without treatment or vaccination. It is a flu-like disease, and if you treat those who are infected with COVID-19 with Ivermectin or Hydroxychloroquine, this survival rate even goes up significantly.

Do not buy into the marketing stories of Big Pharma. Do not become a slave to fear. Do your own research. Do not be pushed into taking a vaccine if you don’t want to. You are not the only one resisting these developments. Join with others online and offline. You are not alone in this. We are all in this together.

Mandatory Voluntary Vaccines

As the COVID-19 vaccinations are being rolled out worldwide, the debate about voluntary or mandatory vaccinations keeps flaring up. While many politicians are in favor of mandatory vaccination, there are many laws and constitutions prohibiting this from happening.

In this situation, many people argue that if mandatory vaccination is not possible, then the ones who don’t take the jab might not be able to participate in every aspect of society. Only those who are willing to get vaccinated and have proof of this will be able to do join completely.

This may happen with flying, for example. “Qantas ignited a debate when CEO Alan Joyce announced that the airline would possibly require international travelers to immunize themselves against COVID before flying (whenever vaccines are ready and accessible).” Read more… 

In the UK there is talk about making vaccinations mandatory for coming to work “It is possible that people who refused to get vaccination may be banned from coming into work, according to Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat.” Read more… 

Cruise ships are starting to demand proof of vaccination for going on a cruise. “Indiana-based river line American Queen Steamboat Company and sister brand Victory Cruise Lines on Tuesday Feb. 2 became the first North American cruise brands to announce that passengers will need to show proof of being vaccinated for COVID‑19 before stepping on a vessel…” Read more… 

In Australia, “Shoppers and diners may have to be vaccinated before entering stores or restaurants after the workplace safety regulator allowed businesses to require their customers to show proof of immunization.” Read more… 

This is just a collection of examples in the news at this moment. The trend is clear. Vaccines are not mandatory, but it will become very restricted what you may be able to do if you don’t get a vaccine. No traveling, flying, going to restaurants, visiting shops, going to work. What is left?

Besides the moral side of the story, pushing people to get a vaccine if they want to do things that everybody used to do before the start of the COVID-19 outbreak and the fear pandemic, this strategy ignores the fact that certain levels of natural immunity can also be acquired.

There are many, especially young people, who get infected with COVID-19 and then recover after experiencing only mild symptoms, or no symptoms at all. Those who have been infected this way also develop a form of immunity without ever receiving medications or vaccinations.

“Scientists studied the blood of 188 volunteers who had confirmed covid-19…. 95% of people in the study had some level of immune memory in their antibodies, B cells, and T cells to the virus five to eight months after their symptoms first began.” Read more… 

By taking measures which make vaccination virtually mandatory, the alternative being locked out of society for the biggest part, you practically force people who are healthy and have natural immunity to get vaccinated, just to be able to show proof of vaccination.

This push for vaccination cannot be motivated by concern for the health of individuals or the general public health. This can only be motivated by the greed of Big Pharma and the desire for more power and control from political institutions who are lobbying for worldwide vaccination.

To stay free, we have to keep fighting these initiatives. As a consumer, you can decide what to do with your money. I advise you to stop supporting companies which advocate mandatory vaccination and choose their libertarian competitors. Do that, and the message will be clear.

The Future of Vaccines

In doing research for my blog, I have started to follow quite a few websites. One of the best websites I found is The Corbett Report,  a very informative website made by James Corbett. It is clear that James is very well informed about many subjects, including vaccination.

He has also made the best video that I know about the COVID-19 vaccinations, and the implications that introducing these new types of vaccinations to humanity may have. Instead of writing another article about vaccinations, I will just show this brilliant documentary here.

“If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.” 



The WHO & Vaccinations

One of the key players in the COVID-19 outbreak and the fear pandemic that we are currently experiencing is the World Health Organization. And anyone who has followed the news around the WHO will have noticed that the full focus is on developing vaccines, not medicines.

“The world is in the midst of a COVID-19 pandemic. As WHO and partners work together on the response — tracking the pandemic, advising on critical interventions, distributing vital medical supplies to those in need— they are racing to develop and deploy safe and effective vaccines.”
Source: WHO website.

I have looked on the WHO website for information on possible treatments of COVID-19, and Ivermectin is mentioned as a medicine, but not specifically for COVID-19, and Hydroxychloroquine is only mentioned as a drug that is not effective in treating COVID-19.

It is truly amazing that in a world where many doctors have proven with scientific research, and undeniable results, that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are effective in the treatment of COVID-19, the leading health organization simply ignores these facts.

The WHO has a history of favoring vaccines in promoting health, and of diminishing the possible negative effects of vaccines in their communications to the public. The WHO is also almost completely ignoring the option of using medicines to combat the COVID-19 outbreak.

When looking at the how and why of this seeming conflicting way of dealing with a health crisis, a record of the sponsoring of the WHO clarifies this unbalanced view. The WHO is heavily sponsored by organizations aimed at promoting vaccines.

In the “Top 20 contributors to the WHO for the 2018/2019 biennium”  you can find that in these two years, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored the WHO for 455 million USD, and the GAVI Alliance for another 389 million USD.

It would be naïve to think that such a big sponsoring has no effect on the decisions of an organization. What is the relationship between the WHO and Big Pharma? Does the behavior of the WHO as an organization reflect independence or a clear focus on vaccinations?

It is of critical importance that you do your own research on these things. Check out what is happening worldwide with treatment of COVID-19 related to Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. Then decide for yourself if the WHO is primarily interested in your health.

The Relentless Push for Worldwide Vaccinations

For politicians and mainstream media, 2020 has been the year of the COVID-19 outbreak and the lockdowns which followed, as the main thing happening that year. It does not matter that wars and hunger had a bigger impact on the planet, 2020 was declared, “The Year of COVID-19.”

Anyone not spending his days meditating in a cave will have been confronted with the incessant news and updates about the spread of COVID-19. Plus all the posts on social media, including the jokes, debates, opinions and memes.

All jokes aside, what made the COVID-19 outbreak the central theme of 2020, if worse things were happening at the planet last year? The reason is that the COVID-19 outbreak was used as an excuse to launch “The Great Reset” by a global elite.

One thing on the agenda of the Great Reset is to get everyone on the planet vaccinated against COVID-19. Considering the low IFR of COVID-19, especially for younger people, this is a highly questionable goal, from the perspective of protecting the health of the people.

Yet, if everyone goes along with this idea, the pharmaceutical industry will not make millions but billions of dollars, and political institutions will have more power and new tools to control people. Vaccine passports, mandatory testing, forced quarantines for the disobedient, you name it.

In the first months of the COVID-19 outbreak I was flabbergasted about the harsh attacks upon Dr. Rob Elens, MD, a Dutch doctor who treated patients with hydroxychloroquine with very good results.  He was ridiculed and attacked for it.

Only later I understood that the pharmaceutical industry would have to fight this, because according to FDA regulations they would not have been able to produce vaccines with an emergency procedure, if a working medicine was available. THAT would have meant a loss of billions of dollars.

The exact same is happening now with Ivermectin. A small percentage of the world is vaccinated with the experimental vaccines, developed with an emergency procedure. A good alternative to vaccination is treating people who get infected with COVID-19 with Ivermectin.

Yet, if this would become commonly accepted, as many studies suggest we should, there would not be a need to vaccinate everyone. So there would also be no need for immune passports, for extreme lockdowns, or for martial law.

What else can I conclude from this that this is not about my health or yours, but about money and political power? The push for worldwide vaccination is an organized attack upon our freedom. If you believe otherwise, please contact me and tell me why you believe this.

Petition Against Mandatory Vaccination

Recently I found an interesting website from “America’s Frontline Doctors”  with a petition “to prevent people from being intimidated or pressured into taking experimental vaccines.”

These doctors are not against vaccines in general, as some organizations are. America’s Frontline Doctors clearly state in their disclaimer: “SMD & AFLDS is NOT “anti-vaxx” or in any other form to be considered or mislabeled as disapproving of established, reputable vaccines when taken voluntarily without coercion.”

For me, this is a crucial difference. Vaccines are not evil. There are vaccines which have proven to be a blessing and vaccines which have proven to be a curse to humanity. With the new, experimental vaccines, we don’t know yet which of the two it will be. We can make predictions, but only time will tell.

In most countries there is some kind of (constitutional) law which states that these vaccinations cannot be made mandatory. Yet how much is your right to decide for yourself worth if a lot of external pressure is applied to try to force you to get your shot?

How “voluntary” are vaccines, when there is talk about making people unable to fly, to cross borders, enter restaurants and cinema’s, get healthcare, or even enter the place where they work, without a “vaccine passport?”

I have nothing against vaccines in general. I have great problems with coercion, lack of transparency, and lack of freedom. What is currently happening worldwide is a giant operation to get the whole world vaccinated against COVID-19, with experimental vaccines.

The ones who organize this gigantic experiment don’t ask my opinion or yours about whether we want this or not, or whether we think it is the best thing to do. So please check out this website, and if you agree with me that this is a cause worth supporting, please sign the petition.

Vaccinations & The WHO

The World Health Organization plays a key role in the current COVID-19 outbreak, offering advice to the whole world on how to deal with this emergency. Most countries follow this advice.

In this situation, it is obviously an enormous responsibility that rests on the shoulders of the WHO. This is a task which should be done with great care, I would think.

The kind of information which the WHO spreads to the world should be examined very carefully, and should be in harmony with current healthcare knowledge and science.

Recently, I was shocked to find out what kind of information is actually shared with the world, about the specific topic of the “WHO Herd Immunity Definition.”

I read about a strange change of the definition of “herd immunity” while reading an article on the Activist Post website , a platform which offers information not usually seen in the mainstream media.

This definition was changed in 2020 by the WHO. The Original WHO Herd Immunity Definition

as it was present on 9 June 2020 stated: “Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”

This definition makes it very clear that immunity can also be developed without vaccination in some cases. Yet this definition was removed, and on 31 December 2020 replaced by  The New WHO Herd Immunity Definition.

The new definition focuses only on vaccinations, even though it is already clear that many people have developed immunity through mild or even asymptomatic COVID-19 infections.

There is no significant role for an effective response of our immune system in this new definition. “Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through vaccination.…”

This is a reversal of the truth. We know that our immune system can develop immunity against COVID-19-like diseases without vaccines in healthy people. We don’t know yet how safe the experimental vaccines are, and how much protection they will offer.

Vaccines in themselves are not bad or evil, as some people suggest. They can be used in harmony with prophylactics, treatments, and our immune system’s natural defenses for our health.

Based on the information above, I have great difficulty believing that the WHO is not influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to promote massive vaccination rather than only promoting health. If you believe differently, please contact me and let me know why you disagree.

COVID-19 & Vaccine Hesitancy

The WHO defines “vaccine hesitancy” as “delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccine services.” (Source: WHO ) I think this is a strange way of formulating the issue, since there are always risks involved when you take a vaccine. This definition does not address the fact that taking a vaccine is always an evaluation of the potential risks versus the potential benefits.

In the Netherlands, a poll showed that one third of the healthcare workers will take a vaccine when it becomes available, one third of the healthcare workers will not take a vaccine, and one third is still unsure about what to do.  So a lot of “vaccine hesitancy” there, and these are highly trained individuals who know a lot about health and healthcare.

I have heard several politicians say that this “vaccine hesitancy” can be solved by giving people good information, but I do not believe that. Dutch healthcare workers are not unusual in this respect, please do your own research on how enthusiastic the healthcare workers in your country are about getting their shots. I believe that these are four good reasons to be “vaccine hesitant” at the moment:

It’s an Experimental Vaccine

This is an experimental vaccine. The technique used in these vaccines is completely new, and therefor any long-term effects cannot be accurately predicted.  How Do The Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines Work?

It is Produced with an Emergency Procedure

The vaccines that will be distributed to the whole world population have been developed about ten times as fast as usual, with emergency procedures which skip several steps of the standard production and testing procedures. This does not mean the vaccines are bad, but common sense dictates that it DOES mean that the risks are of using these vaccines are higher.

There is No Liability for Big Pharma

It does not inspire much trust that the same firms who produce and distribute the vaccines have made sure that they can not be held accountable for any negative side effects. You get your shot and if anything happens to you, you cannot sue the manufacturer. Big Pharma firms will NOT be held accountable for side effects of Covid vaccine  You hear a lot of reassuring words from the pharmaceutical companies about all the different COVID-19 vaccines, but if there are any negative side-effects, you cannot hold them accountable.

There is only a Low Risk for the Young and Healthy

The high-risk group for COVID-19 are the old, especially the older people who already have health problems. If you are young and healthy, your health risks with COVID-19 are not much bigger than with the seasonal flu. Often in situations like these only the vulnerable groups are vaccinated. If the first three good reasons for being reluctant where not present, many young and healthy people might have taken vaccines to protect the vulnerable groups, but in this scenario, I am not too sure this will happen.

So these are some good reasons to be cautious about what you do. I do not believe that simply giving information that is meant to be reassuring but doesn’t contain new facts will motivate people to overcome their “vaccine hesitancy.” That being said, I do not want to tell you what to do or what not to do. Please do your own research and make your own decisions.