The World’s Biggest Genocide?

There is a question that keeps haunting me, as I am doing more and more research for this blog. It is this: “Why is the Holocaust seen by most people in the world as the biggest genocide that ever happened?” How is this so firmly established into the public perception?

I mean, if you go to any browser, use any search engine, and look for “World’s Biggest Genocide,” you will soon be confronted with horrible facts about the regime of Mao. The Holocaust really isn’t the number one crime against humanity in our history.

‘According to the authoritative “Black Book of Communism,” an estimated 65 million Chinese died as a result of Mao’s repeated, merciless attempts to create a new “socialist” China. Anyone who got in his way was done away with — by execution, imprisonment or forced famine.

65 million people! Holy mackerel! Most of these people died during “the Great Leap Forward,” one of the big reforms which Mao forced upon the people in China. And I do not know why I was hardly told about this stuff during my history lessons in high-school. That the cultural revolution in China was the biggest genocide ever.

No, I was again and again pounded with information about the second world war, the Holocaust, the nazis, the “worst thing that ever happened in the world.” And now I am wondering: “How does someone who kills ten times the number of people Hitler killed, remain less notorious?”

I believe that there are three reasons for this situation. I am not 100% sure of these reasons, so if you have an alternative idea or more information to enlighten me, please contact me. But these three reasons keep popping up during my research.

The first reason is that there are a lot of people in the Jewish community worldwide, who have big financial means. Therefore, they can promote all kinds of initiatives to ensure the Holocaust is not forgotten, to remind people that this should never happen again. And that is absolutely true.

The second reason is that the world more and more depends on China for the production of cheap products. Even though human right abuses continue to this day in China, world leaders and heads of states in general only engage in some symbolic statements about these facts. Nobody wants to offend the Chinese government for this reason.

The third reason is that China is now seen by the World Economic Forum as the “model state” for humanity. This is how the whole world should be governed, with a One World Government, that knows how to deal with the people, in a totalitarian way. And it is difficult to see a country as a model if you know how many of their own people they have killed.

I am grateful that there are those who put things in perspective, like Kel Fabie on 8list. ANY genocide is horrible, don’t get me wrong. But in these days, when the great reset is rolled out, it would be good to get a clearer picture about what kind of regime the WEF is so enthusiastic about.

All Lives Matter

When I first heard about the Black Lives Matter movement, after the death of George Floyd, I thought it was a very positive movement. I even shared a post about it on my Facebook account. Now I have both left Facebook and changed my mind about the BLM movement.

After reading more news about the BLM movement, it became clear that the values on which this movement are based are not humanistic. This is not about ending racism, but about promoting a militant activism for black people, as a separate group. And for me, all lives matter.

There are persistent rumors that the BLM is nothing but another tool to disrupt society, and meant to serve as another way to facilitate the great reset. And sponsored for that reason by George Soros, as was suggested in the Fall of the Cabal. 

This was also suggested in an article in the Herland Report: 
“It looks like it pays off for Black Lives Matter to serve the interests of the ultra-rich, which seems to be to divide the American population into sub-groups according to race and color of skin–an archaic racist attitude also practiced among the NAZIS–and make everyone hate each other.”

Until it is clearer for me where BLM stands, I will stick to the “All Lives Matter” slogan. And it is a danger sign that there are BLM supporters who are offended by this. How could you be offended by such a general humanistic statement, unless you have a hidden agenda?

Perhaps the most revealing statement comes from someone who has actually been part of the BLM and left. What he has to say boils down to the simple fact that BLM doesn’t care about black people. Check out his statement below and decide if you (still) want to support BLM.

“A Black Lives Matter chapter founder in Minnesota has resigned, claiming that the organization isn’t concerned about helping black communities or helping improve the education quality in Minneapolis, according to a video published last week.”

Who Rules the World?

Years ago I stumbled upon a quote which really opened my eyes. This quote pointed out that those who we believe rule the world, like presidents and kings, don’t really rule the world. There are people behind the scenes who really rule the world.

When I did more research, I found out that those who are pulling the strings behind the scenes are not silent about this either. As James Corbett recently pointed out, these things are not kept secret in clouds of mystery, the ones in power talk quite openly about it.

To understand who rules the world, it must be clear first that if you have vast amounts of money, you can buy vast amounts of influence, through lobbying, think tanks, bribing, propaganda, legal action, and so on. Those who own the money rule the world.

I think very few people are truly aware that the people behind the central banks actually hold the power to rule the world from behind the scenes. Neither do they know how much this system of central banking, fractional reserve banking, is rigged for the rich and against the common man.

In this seeming hopeless situation, with the cards heavily stacked against us, there is hope. Good will always overcome evil. When enough people become aware of this injustice, and take meaningful action, I believe things WILL change for the better.

A Republic or a Democracy?

I was brought up with the idea that democracy is the highest form of government, the most just and the most honest. I literally didn’t doubt that this was true for the first thirty years of my life, fully convinced that every other form of government was inferior to democracy.

Then one day I stumbled upon a quote that really made me think about this ideal of democracy. “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb, voting on what to have for lunch.”(Most-often attributed to Benjamin Franklin)  In this situation, things don’t look good for the lamb.

This is of course a situation we recognize in democratic countries all around the world. Minorities have little to say about what is happening in politics, and are often marginalized, ignored, or discriminated against. Democracy only works really well for the majority.

If a democratic system is not the solution, then what is? I am leaning more and more towards the system of the republic. The main reason for this is that when you set up a republic, as they did this in the USA, there is far more focus on individual sovereignty.

Yes, all kinds of decisions are made by the elected officials, but they always have to be in harmony with the constitution, which cannot be violated. This limits the power of the government, which is exactly the reason the constitution was written in the first place.

Discussing the pro’s and cons of democracies versus republics immediately gets us to the core of the matter. Are the people there to serve the government, or is the government there to serve the people? If serving the people is the goal, then the power should be given to the people.

Source image.

In the Netherlands we have seen many strange things happening in recent years. Backroom deals to join the European Union. The government lying about the presence of nuclear arms on Dutch soil. Massive spying on the Dutch citizens by the Dutch intelligence agencies. And so on.

The Netherlands is a democracy, with a government which is hardly restricted in its actions, as for example recent changes in the laws related to the evening curfew show us. Would all the things that I mentioned also have happened in a republic where people really have some power?

I believe it is time to evaluate what we should do after the big clean-up, which will have to follow the end of the great reset. I think the Netherlands should not be a democracy and monarchy anymore, but become a republic. And maybe all other countries should become republics too.